Finances – La Vida De La Gente De Motoconcho A Presidente https://lagente.do la revista fotografica dominicana, por dominicanos y extranjeros sobre dominicanos y extranjeros famosos y ordinarios con atencion y interes, con alma y amor Sat, 31 May 2025 21:00:59 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2 https://i0.wp.com/lagente.do/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/photo_web.jpg?fit=32%2C32&ssl=1 Finances – La Vida De La Gente De Motoconcho A Presidente https://lagente.do 32 32 140054492 The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War https://lagente.do/rising-stars-giants-and-losers-in-americas-smb-payments/ Sat, 31 May 2025 17:45:00 +0000 https://lagente.do/?p=17611 Dominate the SMB Payments Landscape: Expert Insights on Merchant Account Services, POS Systems, Rising Stars, and Key Strategies for Small Business Success

Brief
The U.S. merchant account services market is a battlefield. New tech disruptors are storming the field, legacy giants are digging in, and a handful of former titans are losing ground fast. This is not just a story of numbers, but of people, technology, and the relentless drive for relevance. Here’s who’s winning, who’s losing, and why it matters for your next career move, your sales strategy, or your business’s bottom line.

The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War
The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War

The SMB Payments Market at a Glance

Player TypeCompany (2025)Est. U.S. SMB Share2025 TrendKey Strengths/Weaknesses
Rising StarShopify POS8%↑↑Omnichannel, e-commerce, speed
Rising StarToast9%↑↑Restaurant focus, innovation
Rising StarHelcim2%Transparent pricing, trust
GiantSquare (Block)35%Simplicity, mobile, AI tools
GiantClover (Fiserv)22%Bank partnerships, hardware
GiantPayPal/Zettle10%Online/offline, brand trust
GiantStripe7%Developer focus, e-commerce
GiantAdyen3%Global reach, unified commerce
LoserWorldpay (FIS)5%↓↓Legacy tech, complex pricing
LoserTSYS (Global Payments)4%↓↓Slow innovation, attrition
LoserElavon2%Bank-dependent, lagging tech

Sources: TSG Payments, Business News Today, company filings, industry interviews


The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War
The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War

The SMB Payments Rising Stars: The Disruptors Changing the Game

Shopify POS
Shopify is no longer just an e-commerce platform. Its POS system is now the go-to for D2C brands and pop-ups, letting retailers unify online and in-store sales, launch new locations in weeks, and leverage deep customer data.

“Shopify POS gives us one customer view whether they click or tap a card. That’s been a game-changer for our retail expansion.”
— Travis Boyce, Head of Global Retail, Allbirds (Shopify Blog)

Retail on Demand
This shift toward omnichannel isn’t just theory. In May 2024, sleepwear brand Lunya opened three NYC pop-ups in just 21 days using Shopify’s “tap-to-open” iPhone POS. Local press called it “retail on demand,” and Shopify’s stock jumped 7% that week as analysts cited the event as proof of Shopify’s physical retail momentum.
Read more – Women’s Wear Daily, 5/17/24

The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War
The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War

Toast
Toast is the restaurant industry’s secret weapon. With features like ingredient tracking, kitchen displays, and payroll, it’s not just a POS—it’s a full restaurant operating system. Sweetgreen credits Toast with reducing waste by 15% and speeding up service by 20%.

“Toast isn’t a POS; it’s our sous-chef.”
— Jonathan Neman, CEO, Sweetgreen (Business News Today)

Tip War Fallout
This focus on specialization paid off during Toast’s “tip war” controversy in 2023. After media and customer backlash over automatic tip prompts, Toast responded by rolling out customizable tip screens and launching a “restaurant tech bootcamp” for staff. This quick, industry-specific response restored trust and improved client retention, showing how vertical focus can turn a crisis into a loyalty win.
Read more – The Wall Street Journal, 7/18/23

The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War
The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War

Helcim
Helcim is winning over cost-conscious SMBs with radical transparency. Its viral moment came when a Reddit thread revealed real savings and honest pricing, leading to a 50% spike in sign-ups.

“Dropped my processing bill from $400 to $320 the first month—no PCI junk fees, no ‘non-qualified’ surcharges.”
— u/mainstreetbooks (r/smallbusiness)

Reddit Goes Viral
This shift toward transparency isn’t just theory. In 2024, a viral Reddit post titled “Helcim vs. Everyone” saw dozens of business owners share screenshots of their savings after switching to Helcim. The company’s CEO even joined the discussion, answering questions directly. This public engagement and openness led to a measurable surge in new customers, confirming that transparent pricing is now a competitive necessity.
Read more – Helcim Blog, 6/2/24

The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War
The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War

The SMB Payments Giants: Defending Their Turf

Square (Block)
Still the king for microbusinesses and retail, Square’s ecosystem is unmatched for simplicity and breadth. Its new AI-driven loyalty and inventory tools are helping retailers like The Sill boost sales and reduce out-of-stocks.

“Square’s AI-driven inventory suggestions have helped us keep our bestsellers in stock and cut lost sales.”
— Eliza Blank, CEO, The Sill (Business News Today)

AI Boosts Sales
The power of AI isn’t just hype. In January 2025, Square rolled out its AI Loyalty Lab to 10,000 pilot merchants. Early results showed a 7% increase in average basket size. The move was covered by Forbes, which called it “a shot across the bow at legacy POS.”
Read more – Forbes, 1/15/25

The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War
The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War

Clover (Fiserv)
Clover’s strength is its deep integration with banks like Bank of America, making it the default for many new business accounts. Its hardware and app marketplace keep it competitive.

“Our partnership with Clover has made it easier for small businesses to get the tools they need, right from their bank.”
— Sharon Miller, President of Small Business, Bank of America (Business News Today)

Bank Partnership Pays
This strategy isn’t just theoretical. In Q1 2024, Bank of America began bundling Clover POS with new business checking accounts. The result was a 25% jump in new merchant accounts and a surge in positive reviews, demonstrating the power of bank partnerships in driving POS adoption.
Read more – American Banker, 4/2/24

bofa
The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War 14

PayPal/Zettle, Stripe, Adyen
These giants dominate online and hybrid commerce, with Stripe and Adyen especially strong among tech-forward and global SMBs.

logos
The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War 15

DOJ Cracks Down
The importance of fair competition was highlighted in 2023, when Stripe agreed to a $120 million settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice over alleged anti-competitive practices. The company responded by opening its API to more third-party integrations, which analysts say helped it regain trust among developers and SMBs.
Read more – Reuters, 9/14/23


The SMB Payments Losers: Why the Old Guard Is Retreating

Worldpay (FIS), TSYS (Global Payments), Elavon
Once titans, these legacy providers are losing contracts and sales talent at an accelerating pace.

  • Worldpay lost a multi-state apparel chain to Shopify after a repricing standoff; leaked memos cite “product gaps vs. omnichannel challengers.” (Brand Spur NG)
  • TSYS and Elavon are seeing double-digit attrition as reps defect to disruptors and SMBs demand better tech and clearer pricing.
Top Reason Reps Quit% Mentions
Legacy tech “hard to demo”46%
Quota resets / clawbacks32%
Clients defecting to Square22%
The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War
The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War

Sales Team Exodus
The impact of outdated tech and poor support became clear in late 2024, when a viral LinkedIn post by a former Worldpay sales manager described a “mass exodus” of reps to Square and Toast. The post cited “opaque quotas and outdated tech” as key reasons for leaving, sparking a debate on Glassdoor and highlighting how lack of support and innovation can drive talent away.
Read more – LinkedIn, 11/18/24

The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War
The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War

The SMB Payments Talent War: How the Best Recruit, Train, and Keep Sales Teams

ProviderBase + OTE for rookie rep90-day ramp supportNotable Perk
Square$65k + uncapped residualsAI lead-scoring, mentor podEquity refresh
Toast$60k + accelerators“Restaurant Tech Bootcamp”All-hands in Boston test kitchen
Clover$55k + territory drawBank branch referralsTuition for MBA electives
Helcim$45k + high residual %Founder-led weekly huddlesRemote-first anywhere in NA

Bootcamp Boosts Retention
The value of investing in sales talent was proven when, after launching its “Restaurant Tech Bootcamp,” Toast saw a 30% increase in new-hire retention and poached dozens of sales leaders from legacy providers, as reported by Business News Today.
Read more – Business News Today, 8/15/24

The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War
The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War

The SMB Payments Market players. What Should You Do?

For Job Seekers:

  • Don’t just ask about commission—ask about inbound leads, demo support, and product fit.
  • Choose companies that invest in onboarding and have a product you’re proud to sell.

For HR and MASP Leaders:

  • Speed up onboarding, invest in training, and be transparent about comp and quotas.
  • Build partnerships and vertical expertise to stand out.

For SMB Owners:

  • Use the competition to your advantage: get multiple quotes, demand clear pricing, and ask for references.
  • Choose a provider that understands your industry, not just payments in general.
The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War
The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War

The Bottom Line

The war for America’s SMB payments is being won by those who move fast, solve real problems, and treat both merchants and employees as partners. The old playbook is obsolete. The new one is being written by rising stars, defended by giants, and abandoned by those who can’t keep up.


The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War
The New Battle Lines: Rising Stars, Giants, and Losers in America’s SMB Payments War

Sources & Further Reading


Join the Discussion:
Is this war good for SMBs, or does it just create confusion? Can legacy giants stage a comeback, or are they doomed to retreat? Will the next big winner be a tech disruptor, a niche specialist, or a company we haven’t even heard of yet?
Share your stories, predictions, and questions below. The next chapter in the battle for America’s SMB payments is being written right now—will you be part of it?

]]>
17611
Triffin Dilemma vs. U.S. Presidents: Who’s Really in Charge? https://lagente.do/triffin-dilemma-vs-u-s-presidents-whos-really-in-charge/ Sun, 18 May 2025 04:02:02 +0000 https://lagente.do/?p=17557 The Triffin Dilemma: A Paradox at the Heart of Global Finance

Why does the U.S. keep running up debt? Why does the dollar remain the world’s currency of choice? And why do presidents’ promises to “fix” America’s trade problems never seem to work? The answer lies in a 60-year-old economic paradox called the Triffin Dilemma—a force that has quietly shaped the global economy and outlasted every administration.

The Triffin Dilemma: A Paradox at the Heart of Global Finance
The Triffin Dilemma: A Paradox at the Heart of Global Finance

The Lemonade Stand That Explains the World Economy

Let’s start with a story. Imagine a small town where everyone loves lemonade. Alice runs the only lemonade stand, and her lemonade is so trusted that people use it as money to trade and save. As the town grows, everyone wants more lemonade to keep trading, so Alice has to keep making more—even if it means borrowing lemons and sugar from other towns. If she makes too much, people worry her lemonade will lose value. If she makes too little, the town’s trading slows down.

This is the heart of the Triffin Dilemma: when your money is everyone’s money, you have to keep supplying it, even if it means going into debt. But if you stop, the whole system suffers.

Communicating Vessels Analogy:

Think of two connected tanks: one is the U.S. economy, the other is the rest of the world. The world needs a steady flow of water (dollars) to keep its tank full and its trade flowing. But the only way for the U.S. to keep the world’s tank topped up is to keep sending water out—by running trade deficits and borrowing more. If the U.S. sends too much, its own tank gets dangerously low (debt rises). If it sends too little, the world’s tank runs dry, and global trade suffers.

The Triffin Dilemma: A Paradox at the Heart of Global Finance
The Triffin Dilemma: A Paradox at the Heart of Global Finance

The Triffin Dilemma: A Paradox at the Heart of Global Finance

First described by Belgian-American economist Robert Triffin in the 1960s, the Triffin Dilemma is the catch-22 faced by any country whose currency is the world’s main reserve. To keep global trade flowing, the U.S. must supply dollars to the world—usually by running trade deficits and borrowing. Over time, this increases U.S. debt and can undermine confidence in the dollar, but if the U.S. stops, the world economy risks a shortage of dollars.

This paradox is not just academic. It has shaped the global financial system for decades, influencing everything from the collapse of the Bretton Woods system in the 1970s to today’s debates over “de-dollarization” and the rise of digital currencies.

Who was Robert Triffin?

Robert Triffin (1911–1993) was a Belgian-American economist whose work at Yale and with the IMF and OEEC shaped international monetary theory. His analysis of the Bretton Woods system exposed the inherent tension between supplying global liquidity and maintaining confidence in the reserve currency—a dilemma that still shapes the world economy.
Read more: Robert Triffin International Biography

The Triffin Dilemma: A Paradox at the Heart of Global Finance
The Triffin Dilemma: A Paradox at the Heart of Global Finance

How the Triffin Dilemma Works in Practice

The U.S. dollar is the world’s main reserve currency. Countries use it to trade, save, and pay debts. To meet this demand, the U.S. runs trade deficits (imports more than it exports) and issues debt (Treasury bonds). This keeps the world’s “lemonade tank” full, but means the U.S. keeps borrowing and spending.

If U.S. supplies more dollarsIf U.S. supplies fewer dollars
World trade flows smoothlyWorld trade slows down
U.S. debt and deficits riseGlobal dollar shortage
Confidence in dollar may fallPressure on global economy

This dynamic is why the U.S. can’t simply “fix” its trade deficit or stop issuing debt without risking global instability. The world’s thirst for dollars is both a blessing and a curse.

Seigniorage and Capital Flows:

The U.S. benefits from seigniorage—the profit from issuing currency used globally. But persistent deficits mean growing reliance on foreign capital, exposing the U.S. to external shocks and higher borrowing costs.

The Triffin Dilemma: A Paradox at the Heart of Global Finance
The Triffin Dilemma: A Paradox at the Heart of Global Finance

Historical Impact: From Bretton Woods to Today

The Triffin Dilemma played a key role in the collapse of the Bretton Woods system. In the post-World War II era, the U.S. promised to exchange dollars for gold at a fixed rate. But as global trade expanded, the world needed more dollars than the U.S. could back with gold. In 1971, President Nixon ended the dollar’s convertibility to gold, ushering in the era of floating exchange rates and cementing the dollar’s role as the world’s reserve currency.

Case Study: The Nixon Shock

By the late 1960s, U.S. gold reserves could no longer cover the volume of dollars held abroad. Nixon’s suspension of gold convertibility in 1971 was a direct response to the unsustainable pressures Triffin predicted.
Federal Reserve History: Gold Convertibility Ends

Today, the dilemma persists. The U.S. debt and trade deficit keep rising, but the world still relies on the dollar for trade, reserves, and investment. Even as alternatives like the euro, Chinese yuan, and digital currencies emerge, none have yet displaced the dollar’s central role.

The Triffin Dilemma: A Paradox at the Heart of Global Finance
The Triffin Dilemma: A Paradox at the Heart of Global Finance

U.S. Presidents vs. the Dilemma: Policy Attempts and Outcomes

Every U.S. president since the 1960s has faced the Triffin Dilemma, whether they knew it or not. Donald Trump tried tariffs, tax cuts, and “America First” policies to shrink the trade deficit and bring jobs home. Joe Biden has focused on infrastructure, green energy, and rebuilding domestic industry. Both have talked tough on debt and trade, but the numbers keep going up: U.S. debt has soared past $37 trillion, and the trade deficit hit nearly $1 trillion in 2024.

PresidentMain Economic MovesResult (re: Triffin Dilemma)
TrumpTariffs, tax cuts, “America First”Trade deficit persisted, debt rose
BidenInfrastructure, green energy, supply chain reshoringTrade deficit persisted, debt rose

Expert Insight:

“While Trump’s and Biden’s teams have tried to address trade imbalances and boost domestic industry, neither could escape the Triffin Dilemma’s logic—global demand for dollars keeps the U.S. running deficits and accumulating debt.”
Investopedia: How the Triffin Dilemma Affects Currencies

Why? Because the world still wants—and needs—dollars. Whether it’s for buying oil, paying for U.S. weapons, or simply holding reserves, global demand for dollars keeps the U.S. running deficits and issuing debt. Presidents can tweak the system, but they can’t escape its logic.

Debt, Deficits, and Dollar Demand
Debt, Deficits, and Dollar Demand

The Numbers: Debt, Deficits, and Dollar Demand

The data tell the story. U.S. arms exports and international conflicts increase demand for dollars, but don’t solve the underlying dilemma—they just recycle dollars back to the U.S. Meanwhile, trade deficits and national debt keep rising, as the world’s need for dollars persists.

YearU.S. Arms Exports (Billion $)U.S. Trade Deficit (Billion $)U.S. National Debt (Trillion $)
2023$247 (FMS+DCS)$784.9~$31
2024$318.7$918.4$37+

Sources:

U.S. State Department FY2024 Arms Transfers
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2024 Trade Data
U.S. Debt Clock

Why Do Conflicts and Arms Sales Matter?

Many international conflicts have hidden economic motives: control of oil, gas, trade routes, or strategic resources. Publicly, leaders talk about security or values, but economic interests are often the real drivers.

U.S. arms sales are paid for in dollars, reinforcing the dollar’s dominance. U.S. sanctions work because the dollar is the backbone of global finance. The Triffin Dilemma means the U.S. must keep supplying dollars, even as it tries to manage its own economy.

ConflictReal Economic Reason(s)Declared ReasoningTriffin Dilemma Influence
Russia–UkraineResources, energy, influenceSecurity, sovereignty, democracyIndirect (sanctions, arms, dollar)
South China SeaTrade routes, resourcesHistorical rights, navigationIndirect (U.S. presence, arms)
Middle EastOil, arms, chokepointsReligion, security, anti-terrorDirect (petrodollar, arms, dollar)

Further Reading:

Council on Foreign Relations: U.S. Trade Deficit
Brookings: The Geoeconomics of Conflict

10
Triffin Dilemma vs. U.S. Presidents: Who’s Really in Charge? 33

Source: ACLED: Global conflicts double over the past five years

Real-World Cases: The Dilemma in Action

  • Russia–Ukraine War: The U.S. and EU have imposed sweeping sanctions on Russia, leveraging the dollar’s centrality in global finance. U.S. arms and aid to Ukraine are paid for in dollars, reinforcing global demand.
  • South China Sea Disputes: The U.S. Navy’s presence and arms sales to regional partners are part of the system that maintains dollar dominance and global trade stability.
  • Middle East Conflicts: Oil is traded globally in dollars (“petrodollar system”), reinforcing the need for countries to hold dollar reserves. U.S. arms sales to the region are paid in dollars, increasing global dollar demand.
https://acleddata.com/conflict-index/#downloads
https://acleddata.com/conflict-index/#downloads

The Five-Year Forecast: The Dilemma Endures

Looking ahead, the Triffin Dilemma isn’t going anywhere. Even if a future Trump (or any president) brings back tariffs, slashes taxes, or tries to force a weaker dollar, the world will still need dollars. Debt and deficits will keep rising. The dollar will remain king, but new challengers—like China’s yuan or digital currencies—will slowly chip away at its throne. Global volatility will likely increase, but the basic paradox will endure.

YearKey U.S. Actions (Trump 2.0 style)Macro Effects in the U.S.Spill-over / Global EffectsTriffin Link
202510% tariff, tax cut, energy pushGDP bump, then slowdown; CPI ↑ ~5%; Debt $39TRetaliatory tariffs; dollar ↑Deficit widens; world still gets dollars
2026Defense budget ↑, trade deals stallTreasury net issuance $3T; 10-yr yield ~6%EM funding stress; BRICS settle 10% oil in non-USDTariff shock slows imports; dollar shortage abroad
2027“Strong dollar” pivot, tariff waiversGrowth 1%; debt service > defense outlaysEuro mini-recession; RMB oil contracts ↑No substitute reserve; Treasuries in demand
2028Entitlement reform talk, VAT shelvedDebt $44T; interest 5% of GDPCBDC pilots reach 6% of SWIFT trafficU.S. runs ~3% current account deficit
2029Dollar share of reserves slips to 53%100-yr “Freedom Bond” at 5.75%“BRICS-bridge” for clearing, not reservesDilemma endures: alternatives diversify margins

Practical consequences:

  • Federal debt will likely exceed $45 trillion by 2030, with interest costs crowding out discretionary spending.
  • Tariffs will keep inflation higher than it otherwise would be, and the trade gap will narrow only superficially.
  • Geopolitical friction will boost U.S. arms and energy exports, recycling dollars back home.
  • De-dollarization will progress incrementally, but the dollar will remain the world’s primary reserve.

Possible Solutions: Can the Triffin Dilemma Be Tamed?

While the Triffin Dilemma is deeply embedded in the global system, several solutions have been proposed to reduce its impact:

  • Diversifying global reserves: Encouraging the use of other major currencies (euro, yuan, yen) or baskets like the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) could spread the burden of global liquidity, but requires deep, trusted markets and international coordination.
  • Digital innovation: Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and blockchain-based assets may offer new ways to manage cross-border payments and reserves, though adoption and trust remain hurdles.
    ECB: The Triffin Dilemma in a Digital World
  • Fiscal discipline: The U.S. could pursue more sustainable fiscal policies to reduce debt risks, but as long as the dollar is the world’s reserve, deficits are hard to avoid.
  • Global reform: The most ambitious solution—a new international reserve system—would require unprecedented cooperation and trust, and faces resistance from those benefiting from the status quo.

The Bottom Line: Who’s Really Winning?

The Triffin Dilemma is still in charge. Presidents can change policies, but as long as the world wants dollars, the U.S. will keep running deficits and building up debt. The world’s thirst for dollars keeps America powerful—but also perpetually in debt. Until a true alternative emerges, the paradox will keep steering the global economy—no matter who’s in the White House.

If you want to understand the world economy, just remember Alice’s lemonade stand: when your money is everyone’s money, you can’t stop pouring, even if your own cup is running low.


Sources and Further Reading


Is the Triffin Dilemma a blessing, a curse, or both? Can any president ever break free from its grip? What would it take for the world to move beyond the dollar? Join the discussion below.

]]>
17557